Island Knowledge - National Expertise
Can I use AI as my Lawyer?
Artificial Intelligence has quickly moved from something futuristic to something most of us can access in seconds. It can explain legal concepts, draft documents, and break down complex rules into plain English almost instantly. So it is easy to see why, when legal advice can feel both expensive and intimidating, the thought arises: if AI can already do all of this, do you still need a lawyer?
As a lawyer my answer is predictable … “of course you do”. Anything else and I might as well hang up my boots and go home.
But given my self-interest, I thought… let’s see what AI has to say.
And here is the reply:
“Yes you still need a lawyer. And here is why.
I can explain the law. I can’t stand behind it.
I’m good at summarising legal rules and running examples.
What I can’t do is take responsibility if something goes wrong.
Lawyers are regulated, insured, and accountable.
I’m not. That difference matters when real money, real families, and real consequences are involved.
I only know what I’m told.
If a key fact is missing, I won’t necessarily spot it.
A lawyer will ask the awkward follow-up questions — the ones that prevent expensive mistakes.
Law is about people, not just rules.
Legal issues involve illness, family dynamics, pressure, and timing.
I don’t assess capacity, notice vulnerability, or read between the lines.
Good lawyers do.
Even when I sound confident, I can still be wrong.
I can give an answer that looks right but misses an exception, deadline, or interaction with another rule.
Lawyers are trained to spot risk, not just produce answers.
Where I am useful
I’m excellent at explaining, drafting first versions, and helping you understand what to ask.
Used properly, I make legal advice clearer — not unnecessary.”
So, AI suggests the following approach – Use AI to get informed. Use a lawyer to get advice. Think of AI as a power tool: it can be helpful in skilled hands, dangerous if used alone.
Alas, my job is safe for now!
